Search found 4 matches
- Mon Aug 22, 2016 1:08 pm
- Forum: Hacks, Exploits & Security
- Topic: PSVita 3.61 to 3.60 Intentionally Brick carry out
- Replies: 49
- Views: 185998
Re: PSVita 3.61 to 3.60 Intentionally Brick carry out
The op mentions having a half empty battery. If you turn off your vita mid-update it will brick, I think? I won't guarantee that safe mode fixes it, since I can't find much info on it online. However, if safe mode works, maybe due to it being bricked, it would let you unbrick it with any firmware? E...
- Sun Aug 21, 2016 11:36 pm
- Forum: Hacks, Exploits & Security
- Topic: PSVita 3.61 to 3.60 Intentionally Brick carry out
- Replies: 49
- Views: 185998
Re: PSVita 3.61 to 3.60 Intentionally Brick carry out
Don't Work, Erro C1-6562-9 after apply downgrade to 3.60 Alright, if it didn't semi-brick, I've absolutely no idea. I googled and C1-6562-9 is a 'Downgrade failed' error. As an aside, the OP mentioned that you should hex edit the 3.60 systemdata PUP, replacing 3.60 plaintext with 3.61 inside the PU...
- Sun Aug 21, 2016 10:50 pm
- Forum: Hacks, Exploits & Security
- Topic: PSVita 3.61 to 3.60 Intentionally Brick carry out
- Replies: 49
- Views: 185998
Re: PSVita 3.61 to 3.60 Intentionally Brick carry out
Alright, I studied the OP's post a little more, and I think (but I'm not sure) I understand up until the point where you semi-brick. I will say right now that the bit I really do not understand is which form of update the OP expects to be done (QCMA or Charles system update?). Therefore, if your con...
- Sun Aug 21, 2016 5:19 pm
- Forum: Hacks, Exploits & Security
- Topic: PSVita 3.61 to 3.60 Intentionally Brick carry out
- Replies: 49
- Views: 185998
Re: PSVita 3.61 to 3.60 Intentionally Brick carry out
Hi :wave: I'm curious what this thread is about, but I honestly can't make any sense of these steps. Can you please explain in your native language? From what I've gathered so far, I think you're suggesting to update the Vita via qCMA, edit one of the firmware files and partially brick it, and then ...